This page is part of © FOTW Flags Of The World website

Nieuwe Republiek (South Africa)

Last modified: 2006-01-21 by bruce berry
Keywords: nieuwe republiek | vrijheid |
Links: FOTW homepage | search | random flag | disclaimer and copyright | write us | mirrors



[Nieuwe Republiek (South Africa)] image by António Martins, 02 Mar 1999 See also :

Nieuwe Republiek (Vrijheid)

The Nieuwe Republiek (New Republic) was Zulu territory appropriated by the Transvaal Boers in 1884 and later annexed by the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek (Transvaal) in 1887. It regained by the Natal Colony in 1903. It had its own flag comprising a blue vertical stripe and red, white and green horizontal stripes, being based on the design of the Transvaal 'vierkleur'.
Bruce Berry, 14 June 1996

Like the Vierkleur, but blue and green interchanged, but I don't know why.
Carsten Linke, 11 Oct 1996

Your map of South Africa shows the Nieuwe Republiek as not quite touching the Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek (ZAR). They were in fact adjacent and as mentioned above, it became part of the ZAR and in 1903 part of Natal. The Colony had claimed the Nieuwe Republiek as war reparations. What had confused me over the Nieuwe Republiek was the war reparations received by Natal in 1903, which comprised the districts of Utrecht and Vryheid. This part of the map was very familiar to me, and I knew that these districts had previously been part of the Zuid Afrikaansche Republiek. What I had not realised was that while the Vryheid district had been the Nieuwe Republiek and had become part of the ZAR when the Nieuwe Republiek dissolved itself, the Utrecht district had been part of the ZAR for much longer. Utrecht was a small early Boer republic which was at first not recognised by the other Boer states on the grounds of fear that the British would regard it as an encroachment on their territory. However, the Lydenburg republic eventually not only recognised it but incorporated it, and when Lydenburg, Potchefstroom and Zoutpansberg combined to form the ZAR, Utrecht became part of that state.
Mike Oettle, 14 Dec 2001

Tonight I came across this passage from the Standard Encyclopædia of Southern Africa:
"After Dinizulu, successor to Cetshwayo, who had died in 1884, had appealed in van to the British against Usibepu (Zibhebhu), a rival chieftain, he turned to the Boers. Several hundred farmers from the districts of Utrecht and Vryheid undertook to restore order, in return for land for the formation of an independent republic. They claimed about half of Zululand, including St Lucia Bay, an outlet to the sea. After considerable dispute a Natal arbitration court recognised the New Republic, reduced in size, however, and deprived of its claims to St Lucia. The following year it was absorbed into the Transvaal and the distruct of Vryheid."
This is the only reference I have come across so far to a Boer state in Zululand, and it comes back to the Nieuwe Republiek, as you see. But it is possible that they used the yellow-green-red flag during the initial period when they claimed St Lucia Bay. On the other hand it is possible that Usachev was indulging in a bit of pro-Boer propaganda, publicising the flag of a non-existent state.
Mike Oettle, 14 Jul 2002